Про раков
Pro rakov (ru)
About Crayfish (en)
Sobre el cangrejo (es)
Vähkidest (et)
Over rivierkreeften (nl)
❤ | |
Година | 2003 |
Режисьор(и) | Олшванг Валентин Алексеевич |
Студиа | A-Film |
Езици | Руски |
Жанрове | Романтика Сериозно Фолклор и митове (руски/източнославянски) |
Вид анимация | рисувана (не целулоидна) смесена |
Дължина | 00:15:28 |
Многословност | 4.96 |
Профил в animator.ru | Ru, En |
Субтитри:
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.en.1.25fps.1252825471.srt
Дата: Септември 13 2009 07:04:31
Език: Английски
Качество: добре
Бележки:
Автор(и): Niffiwan, lanasv₃
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.es.1.25fps.1351267127.srt
Дата: Октомври 26 2012 15:58:47
Език: Испански
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 107 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Yefren
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.et.1.25fps.1690126884.srt
Дата: Юли 23 2023 15:41:24
Език: Естонски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 72 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Pastella
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.nl.1.25fps.1337352904.srt
Дата: Май 18 2012 14:55:04
Език: Нидерландски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки:
Автор(и): Eus
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.en.1.25fps.1252825471.srt
Дата: Септември 13 2009 07:04:31
Език: Английски
Качество: добре
Бележки:
Автор(и): Niffiwan, lanasv₃
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.es.1.25fps.1351267127.srt
Дата: Октомври 26 2012 15:58:47
Език: Испански
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 107 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Yefren
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.et.1.25fps.1690126884.srt
Дата: Юли 23 2023 15:41:24
Език: Естонски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 72 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Pastella
⭳ Pro rakov.2003.nl.1.25fps.1337352904.srt
Дата: Май 18 2012 14:55:04
Език: Нидерландски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки:
Автор(и): Eus
Обсъждане
Моля, влезте или се регистрирайте, за да добавяте коментари.
CW: Gore in a scene.
>>1
Indeed. Although I find what happens more disturbing than the way it is visually portrayed, which is why I guess I didn't mark this (I normally really dislike "gore").
By the way, at some point, this site will have a better way of displaying what age category a film is aimed at than a simple "NSFW" genre. So for a film like this, I guess it should clearly be marked as aimed at adults and contraindicated for children (with a "neutral" for teens). There will inevitably be some debatable value judgements involved in that, but on the whole, probably preferable to having no info about that at all.
>>2
Oh, good to hear! Actually I didn't mind much that the site didn't have many content markings as it is relatively now, so I just marked this in the comments just in case. I think marking it as aimed as adult is good enough to avoid showing it to younger audiences by mistake.
Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)? or would it be ok to leave it as that? Just wondering !
>>3
>Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)?
If you feel like it, sure. I suppose for this one, I thought the words "tragic folk story" in the first sentence was enough of a hint that this wouldn't be easy viewing. Mostly, I've been writing warnings for things like nudity, even when it's not actually objectionable (like in "Olympians" - which has male nudity but which I don't feel deserves the "NSFW" genre). Are there some other things you've noticed, then?
>>4
Oh besides the CW I punted out here, I was just thinking of pointing out in next films (if I find it) distubing and graphic stuff that are sensitive to the regular audience. (nudity not counting as it is rather natural) For example: scenes of decapitation, SA, self deleting(? and graphic blood scenes