(Про раков, 2003) от Валентин Олшванг

Текущата страница || История


Про раков
Pro rakov (ru)
About Crayfish (en)
Sobre el cangrejo (es)
Vähkidest (et)
Over rivierkreeften (nl)

Година 2003
Режисьор(и) Олшванг Валентин Алексеевич
Студиа A-Film
Езици Руски
Жанрове Романтика
Сериозно
Фолклор и митове (руски/източнославянски)
Вид анимация  рисувана (не целулоидна)
смесена
Дължина 00:15:28
Многословност 4.96
Профил в animator.ru Ru, En
1137 посетители

Субтитри:
Pro rakov.2003.en.1.25fps.1252825471.srt
Дата: Септември 13 2009 07:04:31
Език: Английски
Качество: добре
Бележки:
Автор(и): Niffiwan, lanasv

Pro rakov.2003.es.1.25fps.1351267127.srt
Дата: Октомври 26 2012 15:58:47
Език: Испански
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 107 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Yefren

Pro rakov.2003.et.1.25fps.1690126884.srt
Дата: Юли 23 2023 15:41:24
Език: Естонски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки: 72 символ(а) (гледане)
Автор(и): Pastella

Pro rakov.2003.nl.1.25fps.1337352904.srt
Дата: Май 18 2012 14:55:04
Език: Нидерландски
Качество: неизвестно
Бележки:
Автор(и): Eus


Видеото се възпроизвежда неправилно? Кликнете тук.



 

Обсъждане



1.Malva_miravis

CW: Gore in a scene.


Replies: >>2
Отговор

2.Admin

>>1
Indeed. Although I find what happens more disturbing than the way it is visually portrayed, which is why I guess I didn't mark this (I normally really dislike "gore").

By the way, at some point, this site will have a better way of displaying what age category a film is aimed at than a simple "NSFW" genre. So for a film like this, I guess it should clearly be marked as aimed at adults and contraindicated for children (with a "neutral" for teens). There will inevitably be some debatable value judgements involved in that, but on the whole, probably preferable to having no info about that at all.


Replies: >>3
Отговор

3.Malva_miravis

>>2
Oh, good to hear! Actually I didn't mind much that the site didn't have many content markings as it is relatively now, so I just marked this in the comments just in case. I think marking it as aimed as adult is good enough to avoid showing it to younger audiences by mistake.

Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)? or would it be ok to leave it as that? Just wondering !


Replies: >>4
Отговор

4.Admin

>>3
>Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)?
If you feel like it, sure. I suppose for this one, I thought the words "tragic folk story" in the first sentence was enough of a hint that this wouldn't be easy viewing. Mostly, I've been writing warnings for things like nudity, even when it's not actually objectionable (like in "Olympians" - which has male nudity but which I don't feel deserves the "NSFW" genre). Are there some other things you've noticed, then?


Replies: >>5
Отговор

5.Malva_miravis

>>4
Oh besides the CW I punted out here, I was just thinking of pointing out in next films (if I find it) distubing and graphic stuff that are sensitive to the regular audience. (nudity not counting as it is rather natural) For example: scenes of decapitation, SA, self deleting(? and graphic blood scenes


Отговор


Моля, влезте или се регистрирайте, за да добавяте коментари.