Absolutely loved the technique, colours and surrealist scenes on this! Will definitely save it on a playlist
Replies: >>2
Thảo luận mới nhất
🡨 Trang trước | Trang sau 🡪Bình luận theo đầu phim The Butterfly (1972)
1.
Malva_miravis
2023-11-04 21:12:45
Absolutely loved the technique, colours and surrealist scenes on this! Will definitely save it on a playlist
Absolutely loved the technique, colours and surrealist scenes on this! Will definitely save it on a playlist
Bình luận theo đầu phim Jirtdan (1969)
4.
Malva_miravis
2023-11-04 19:50:47
>>3
I agree in a lot of this! I was looking for more info of the director but couldn't find more stuff more than his profile on animator.rus, which is a shame because I wanted to see more stuff exactly like this oof. Cut out is one of my favourite animation techniques recently, and every film is different in aesthetic but this one in particular caught my eye. I was wondering if this has a name?
>>3
I agree in a lot of this! I was looking for more info of the director but couldn't find more stuff more than his profile on animator.rus, which is a shame because I wanted to see more stuff exactly like this oof. Cut out is one of my favourite animation techniques recently, and every film is different in aesthetic but this one in particular caught my eye. I was wondering if this has a name?
Replies: >>5
Bình luận theo đầu phim About Crayfish (2003)
3.
Malva_miravis
2023-11-04 19:37:16
>>2
Oh, good to hear! Actually I didn't mind much that the site didn't have many content markings as it is relatively now, so I just marked this in the comments just in case. I think marking it as aimed as adult is good enough to avoid showing it to younger audiences by mistake.
Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)? or would it be ok to leave it as that? Just wondering !
>>2
Oh, good to hear! Actually I didn't mind much that the site didn't have many content markings as it is relatively now, so I just marked this in the comments just in case. I think marking it as aimed as adult is good enough to avoid showing it to younger audiences by mistake.
Right now, would it be fine if I mark some "heavy scenes" (graphic stuff) in the comments just in case as CW/TWs (only if it's really present)? or would it be ok to leave it as that? Just wondering !
Replies: >>4
Bình luận theo đầu phim And It Was Good... (1990)
1.
Malva_miravis
2023-11-04 19:31:22
Quick analyisis: I believe tihs could be an interpretation of how the knight, after being celebrated by wealth and popularity, became as ruthless and authoritarian as the dragon.
Quick analyisis: I believe tihs could be an interpretation of how the knight, after being celebrated by wealth and popularity, became as ruthless and authoritarian as the dragon.
Bình luận theo đầu phim Soap Dodger (1964)
Bình luận theo đầu phim The Story of the Tenth Floor (1986)
1.
Admin
2023-10-25 00:09:37
I'm conflicted about this one. There's nothing really wrong with the plot, but the execution is weird - the animation is either too complex or very crude - the whole approach feels very amateur. And the director had been making films since the early 1970s, so it's not like he was a newbie...
I'm conflicted about this one. There's nothing really wrong with the plot, but the execution is weird - the animation is either too complex or very crude - the whole approach feels very amateur. And the director had been making films since the early 1970s, so it's not like he was a newbie...
Bình luận theo đầu phim Firefly 5 (1964)
2.
Cynir
2023-10-23 20:53:05
This film probably belonged to the line of low-budget works so it used very simple materials. But in return, its aesthetic is quite high and is also very close to the psychology of children in the years before computers. I absolutely love films like this !
This film probably belonged to the line of low-budget works so it used very simple materials. But in return, its aesthetic is quite high and is also very close to the psychology of children in the years before computers. I absolutely love films like this !
Bình luận theo đầu phim The Song of the Cheese Spirit (1997)
1.
Admin
2023-10-20 04:39:04
I find just about all of Smirnova's films so interesting, surprising and enjoyable. It's a shame that she had to have her career exactly in the era when the money for this sort of thing was barely available, and was not nearly as artistically productive as she could have been only a decade earlier.
There's still one film of hers I'd like to translate, but I can't find it - «Когда я был лягушкой» (1992, Приз МКФ «КРОК – 93», Киев).
I find just about all of Smirnova's films so interesting, surprising and enjoyable. It's a shame that she had to have her career exactly in the era when the money for this sort of thing was barely available, and was not nearly as artistically productive as she could have been only a decade earlier.
There's still one film of hers I'd like to translate, but I can't find it - «Когда я был лягушкой» (1992, Приз МКФ «КРОК – 93», Киев).
Bình luận theo đầu phim Who Said "Meow"? (1962)
Bình luận theo đầu phim Firefly 5 (1964)
1.
Admin
2023-10-11 23:38:20 (đã hiệu đính 2023-10-12 00:19:41)
Quite a charming, optimistic film that shows a slice of typical daily life at the time through a child's perspective, but should be interesting for adults too (it's not aimed at them, but it doesn't insult its viewers' intelligence like some children's films). It feels kind of like Roman Kachanov's later films to me.
It seems that by this point, not too much was left of the original "Firefly" concept, other than "collection of shorter stories aimed at children taking place in a contemporary location". Unlike the previous ones, there's no central narrator (firefly or otherwise), and the stories are NOT adapted from previously-released children's books or comics.
It's kind of neat that despite there being two directors (each one responsible for one story, I assume), the film is stylistically unified and the first story flows fairly smoothly into the second.
The directors are also the art directors, but actually, the art style seems heavily inspired by the 1961 "Big Troubles" from the Brumberg sisters.
Quite a charming, optimistic film that shows a slice of typical daily life at the time through a child's perspective, but should be interesting for adults too (it's not aimed at them, but it doesn't insult its viewers' intelligence like some children's films). It feels kind of like Roman Kachanov's later films to me.
It seems that by this point, not too much was left of the original "Firefly" concept, other than "collection of shorter stories aimed at children taking place in a contemporary location". Unlike the previous ones, there's no central narrator (firefly or otherwise), and the stories are NOT adapted from previously-released children's books or comics.
It's kind of neat that despite there being two directors (each one responsible for one story, I assume), the film is stylistically unified and the first story flows fairly smoothly into the second.
The directors are also the art directors, but actually, the art style seems heavily inspired by the 1961 "Big Troubles" from the Brumberg sisters.
🡨 Trang trước | Trang sau 🡪